But where did the roots of this culture lay? We find clues in his upbringing and in the culture that fostered him: San Juan Hill. Born in North Carolina, Monk moved with his family to San Juan Hill, NY at a young age and spent most of his childhood there. In his biography of Monk, Kelley puts the most emphasis on SJH's diversity. In this community there was more than just "Black" and "White." Further variety existed, with both negative and positive results. In one sense, there was a wealth of culture to be explored in SJH. However, these distinctions led to divisions, and divisions to rivalry and turmoil. In the end, the same diversity that pulled so many cultures close together also kept them far apart. The immediate area around Monk's house became his community, his classroom, his playground, and most importantly his safe haven–a block perched on a hill above the interracial turmoil.
Kelley goes on to tell us that "It took a village to raise Monk"(Kelley). More than showing us how Monk was raised, this demonstrates the closeness of the community itself. Monk never took part in extracurricular activities. Instead, he went back home as soon as he was dismissed from class to do something in his community. It's easy to see now that as he progressed as an artist, the community influenced him. He played because the community gave him the means to do so with its youth center and numerous music teachers and jazz musicians. He played not to get away from his neighborhood's economic poverty, but to encapsulate its cultural richness. When people proudly proclaim that "Jazz is New York, man!", they exemplify this idea that music is a product of one's environment. New York jazz is not something imported, but a distinctly New York sound.
Thelonious Monk's story in San Juan Hill closely parallels the stories of many who grew up in Leimert Park, a small area of Los Angeles which in recent years experienced an artistic renewal. Leimert, like SJH, had a history of racial tension. The residents decided to combat this with art, namely jazz. In this sense, Leimert closely copies the atmosphere that SJH probably had in the 1920's and 1930's–it was a little haven in the midst of chaos with diverse roots from all over the world and a strong love for music that gave the place a sense of unity. However, Leimert differs in on key aspect here–while jazz grew out of places like SJH, it's more appropriate to say that jazz grew into Leimert. The simple truth is that Leimert at its peak seemed to me to be more like a museum than an easel. Sadly, the golden age of jazz has passed, making Leimert's devotion to jazz and art more reminiscent than progressive. In comparison, Monk's contributions to jazz in SJH were the early brushstrokes of what would become one of the finest work of art this nation has ever seen.
In the end, I communities need to act as something to react to for a jazz musician. Whether the reaction is negative or positive can be everything here. But in the end, roots can never be ignored.
*Comments on Pritika Nandakumar's blog*
*Comments on Pritika Nandakumar's blog*
I really liked your post, and I think your writing is really refined and truly gave insight into how you interpret Monk's relation to the community. The idea of Monk's hill is a unique perspective, and though I personally saw Monk as being more involved in his community, I can certainly see why you portray him as a more of a speculative individual, using his art form as a way to convey the hardships of the community rather than retreating from them. Great work!
ReplyDeleteYou actually did a really good job. Pretty much took what I wanted to say about Leimert Park and worded it much better. The only thing I'm not sure I agree with is the community aspect of San Juan Hill. Obviously it was a small, close knit community, but it was also fraught with racial tension and sometimes fatally violent interactions. It's difficult to bring all these aspects up within these blog posts, but I do believe that your portrayal of the San Juan Hill community leads one to believe that it was much more functional than it really was. Kelley's portrayal of the community leads me to believe that it was constantly on the verge of tearing itself apart due to it's extreme racial conflicts but that these conflicts also created tight knit sub communities that held everything together. I think this contradiction had a large impact on Monk's distinctive musical style.
ReplyDeleteI think that that view of "community" in SJH is what I had in mind–I suppose I didn't word my blog carefully enough to really explain that. But I definitely agree that it was an area of powerful racial tension, and that in turn created very strong sub-communities in the immediate area around Monk's residence.
DeleteBryan, I thought that you did an excellent job on your blog post! I thought that you did an incredible job describing Thelonious Monk and I loved the opening lines where you described his style and his character. I also like the way you close off your blog post. At the end of the essay, you draw your essay right back to the main point of your thesis "roots can never be ignored." I thought that was excellent way to finish the essay and reiterate your main claim.
ReplyDeleteI loved your main claim: "However, these distinctions led to divisions, and divisions to rivalry and turmoil. In the end, the same diversity that pulled so many cultures close together also kept them far apart. The immediate area around Monk's house became his community, his classroom, his playground, and most importantly his safe haven–a block perched on a hill above the interracial turmoil."
I thought that this thesis statement did an excellent job at describing that although San Juan Hill was rich in diversity and culture- it also led to "turmoil and rivalry."
Great essay!